e

New Blasphemy Law - For or Against?



Posted: Saturday, January 02, 2010

by e
Dhammabucha Rocksprings Meditation


(From Cnn.com Saturday, January 2, 2010).

A blasphemy law went into effect on New Year's Day in Ireland, of which the majority is loyal to Catholicism. The law, punishable by a €25,000-($35,800) fine, was passed in July and became effective January 1.

A person breaks the law by saying or publishing anything "grossly abusive or insulting in relation to matters held sacred by any religion, thereby causing outrage among a substantial number of the adherents of that religion."

Those found guilty of breaking the blasphemy law may try to defend themselves by proving that a reasonable person would find literary, artistic, political, scientific or academic value in what they said or published, the law says.

Atheist Ireland called the law "silly and dangerous," because it provides an incentive for religious outrage. We believe in the golden rule: that we have a right to be treated justly, and that we have a responsibility to treat other people justly. Blasphemy laws are unjust: They silence people in order to protect ideas. In a civilized society, people have a right to express and to hear ideas about religion even if other people find those ideas to be outrageous." the group said.

The group urged the Irish government to repeal the law. It also asked lawmakers for a referendum on removing all references to God from the Irish constitution.

In just reading this article, and having no information regarding the reason or reasons behind a law such as this in Ireland, which can be quite dangerous and violent regarding religious beliefs, it seems as though the main points revolve around two: "proving that a reasonable person would find literary, artistic, political, scientific or academic value in what they said or published, (In defense of the violation). And (The law is) "silly and dangerous," because it provides an incentive for religious outrage. "

If this law was equally applied to politics, would it cause people to become more civil or violent? And what would constitute "grossly abusive or insulting in relation to matters held sacred by any (party) religion, thereby causing outrage among a substantial number of the adherents of that (party) religion."

I understand the right of countries to legislate their own affairs without sticking my nose in. For example; it is an imprisonable offense in Thailand  to publicly say anything derogative about the king. (One of my first warnings when I arrived there in 1981 as an American who typically is accustomed to being outspoken).

On the other hand, if countries harm individuals for expressing their opinions politically or religiously, I see no problem in publicizing facts, all of the facts, and letting readers decide for themselves.

I'm curious about your reaction to this blasphemy law.



E. Raymond Rock (anagarika eddie) is a meditation teacher at DhammaRocksprings Theravada Buddhist Meditation Retreat Center: http://www.dhammarocksprings.org and author of “A Year to Enlightenment: http://www.amazon.com/Year-Enlightenment-Steps-Enriching-Living/dp/1564148912

He lived at Wat Pah Nanachat under Ajahn Chah as a Buddhist monk (novice) and at Wat Pah Baan Taad under Ajahn Maha Boowa and Wat Pah Daan Wi Weg under Ajahn Tui as a fully ordained Buddhist monk (bhikkhu). He was a postulant at Shasta Abbey, a Zen Buddhist monastery in northern California under Roshi Kennett; and a Theravada Buddhist anagarika at both Amaravati Monastery in the UK and Bodhinyanarama Monastery in New Zealand, both under Ajahn Sumedho. The author has meditated with the Korean Master Sueng Sahn Sunim; with Bhante Gunaratana at the Bhavana Society in West Virginia; and with the Tibetan Master Trungpa Rinpoche in Boulder, Colorado. He has practiced at the Insight Meditation Society and the Zen Center in San Francisco.
This Article has been viewed 295 times. (Not updated in real-time.)
Top-level comments on this article: (7 total)
» left by Dianne Lehmann
2 years 131 days ago.
137 fans.
Hi e.
 
I think it is completely crazy based on the facts given and I am shocked that it was passed into law. I certainly hope that nothing like that ever happens here.
 
Dianne
» left by e 2 years 130 days ago.
132 fans.
It is rather shocking. I think that our constitution is all about individual rights, so I don't see a theocratic influence yet, but you never know.

Thanks for your input. Best as always............e
» left by David Tanguay
2 years 130 days ago.
189 fans.
The reason we have our rights and freedoms today in this country is because we rebelled against the King of England. I believe everyone should have the freedom to say what they want to say about any matter religious or political.
» left by e 2 years 130 days ago.
132 fans.
I think they rebelled against the Church of England as well! Thanks David.
» left by Ben Morrish
2 years 130 days ago.
48 fans.
I think it is a terrible, backwards law that violates people's right to free speech.
 
Religions are collections of ideas, and ideas should always be open to criticism.
» left by e 2 years 130 days ago.
132 fans.
I'm not sure how their court system works there, but here the law would be shredded because of ambiguity. "grossly abusive or insulting in relation to matters held sacred by any religion, thereby causing outrage among a substantial number of the adherents of that religion." - - - Say what? What constitutes outrage? Or abusive and insulting? Or even a substantial number?

Thanks Ben.
» left by WhiteGyr
2 years 130 days ago.
13 fans.
The same old theory - if it isn't what I (a majority) think, make it illegal to speak or write opposing views and so there will be none. Kinda the opposite of freedom, ya think?
» left by e 2 years 130 days ago.
132 fans.
Thanks WhiteGyr, It makes one appreciative of our non-religious founding fathers, and a constitution based on individual freedoms, not dogma. True religion can be a wonderful thing if it's private and void of politics. Once a religion falls into the realm of political movements and thinks it has the only answers, I believe that it is gutted of the true meaning of religion, which is a humility of not knowing.    
» left by Joyce Dunn
2 years 130 days ago.
33 fans.
This law is another example of 'us against them' in my opinion. "Blasphemy" is nothing more than an opinion, not fact. Sometimes I feel the human race will NEVER 'get it'...that just because someone disagrees with you, it doesn't make them wrong and you right.
» left by e 2 years 130 days ago.
132 fans.
Hi Joyce, thanks for commenting. Yes, believe it or not, this is the kind of thing that many wars are fought over. Ignorance and stupidity, and a strong desire to control others, persuade and cajole them, even force them to think your way. It makes one want to throw up.    

» left by Joyce Dunn 2 years 130 days ago.
33 fans.
Definitely makes you want to throw up, or scream and rant and rave. :)
» left by Anthony Davis
2 years 126 days ago.
8 fans.
It's terrifying, and I hope the majority of the world continues to look down on the law in distaste. Why don't they go all the way and institute a morality police?
» left by e 2 years 125 days ago.
132 fans.
Yeah, I thought that kind of dark mentality went out with the middle ages. You gotta go figure? Thanks Anthony.
We want your comments! If you can read this, you don't have javascript enabled, so you can't use this comment system. Please enable javascript.